Sample Report Demo

Example: Manchester Accountancy Firm

This is a fictional sample report to show format and depth. It is not a real customer report and does not represent a live client engagement.

Overall AI Visibility
74

Balanced view across SEO, AEO, and GEO signals.

SEO
79

Core search foundations are generally sound.

AEO
68

Answer extraction is possible but can be clearer.

GEO
72

Entity trust signals are present but uneven.

Trust / Entity Signals

Multiple named professional signals detected, but consistency varies across analysed pages.

Schema / Machine Readability

No schema detected in this sample. This is the highest priority technical gap for AI discovery readiness.

Conversion Readiness

Contact options exist, but enquiry pathways can be made clearer on high-intent service sections.

Top 3 Priority Actions

Priority 1

Add AccountingService and Organization schema to the homepage and service page so AI systems can match the firm to commercial queries.

Priority 2

Restructure /what-can-we-do-for-you with separate sections for tax returns, bookkeeping, payroll, accounts, audit, and business advisory.

Priority 3

Add a visible FAQ block and FAQPage schema on the main service page to improve answer extractability for buyer questions.

Evidence-based Findings

Schema and machine readability

High

Affected page: https://example-accountants.co.uk/

Measured evidence: No JSON-LD schema detected on analysed pages.

Business impact: Lower confidence for AI and search systems when mapping service/entity intent.

Recommended fix: Implement Organization + AccountingService schema with confirmed firm facts.

Difficulty/Time: Medium / 45-90 mins

Service clarity

High

Affected page: https://example-accountants.co.uk/what-can-we-do-for-you

Measured evidence: Service sections are broad and mixed; limited explicit service headings.

Business impact: Potential clients may not quickly confirm service fit.

Recommended fix: Create dedicated H2 sections per service with who-it-is-for and next-step CTA.

Difficulty/Time: Medium / 2-4 hours

Conversion readiness

Medium

Affected page: https://example-accountants.co.uk/contact

Measured evidence: Contact path exists, but contextual service CTAs are inconsistent across analysed pages.

Business impact: Visitors may delay enquiry when next steps are not consistently surfaced.

Recommended fix: Add service-page CTAs that link directly to the enquiry path with clear intent language.

Difficulty/Time: Low / 1-2 hours

Example affected pages

Page typeURLFocus
Homepagehttps://example-accountants.co.uk/Schema and entity clarity
Service pagehttps://example-accountants.co.uk/what-can-we-do-for-youService structure, FAQ, answer readiness
About pagehttps://example-accountants.co.uk/about-usTrust and professional proof consistency
Testimonials pagehttps://example-accountants.co.uk/testimonialsMethodology/proof framing
Contact pagehttps://example-accountants.co.uk/contactEnquiry path clarity

Implementation checklist

  • Add Organization + AccountingService schema with confirmed business details.
  • Implement FAQ block with visible questions and concise answers on the service page.
  • Improve H2 service structure and internal links from homepage to service sections.
  • Strengthen process/proof copy on testimonials and service pages.
  • Review mobile performance opportunities for LCP/TBT on key pages.

Example schema recommendation card

Suggested type: AccountingService + Organization. Review before publishing and replace placeholders with confirmed business details.

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "AccountingService",
  "name": "[Confirmed firm name]",
  "url": "https://example-accountants.co.uk/",
  "areaServed": "[Confirmed service area]",
  "provider": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "[Confirmed firm name]"
  }
}

Review before publishing: true

Ready to run this on your own site? Start with the free snapshot and compare it against this sample format.

Demo data only. Not a real client report.